605 Brock Street N, Unit 12 Whitby, Ontario L1N8R2
Shopping Cart
Your Cart is Empty
Quantity:
Subtotal
Taxes
Shipping
Total
There was an error with PayPalClick here to try again

Canadian Mortgage News
Blog
Flaherty Talks Another Bank into Higher Rates
Posted on March 20, 2013 at 9:38 AM |
On Friday, Manulife Bank posted its lowest rate ever on a 5-year fixed mortgage, 2.89%. It lasted for four days.
When our big brothers at the Department of Finance (DoF) caught wind of it, they dialed up Manulife and swayed the bank into raising its rate back to 3.09%. “We don’t want a race to the bottom on mortgage rates by our
financial institutions…,” said Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, as quoted
by Bloomberg. “I had one of my staff call (Manulife) and indicate my displeasure.”
Manulife responded today by saying:
"After consulting with the Department of Finance, Manulife Bank has
withdrawn the (2.89%) promotional campaign and reverted to our previous
posted rate."
So now we have Manulife, the 10th largest bank by assets, being told
by bureaucrats how to price its mortgages. Two weeks ago, BMO got the
same call.
Where does this end? The DoF seems set on breaking the knees of home
prices, one way or another. With it so intent on regulating real estate
transactions, will the next round of headlines read: "Ottawa Legislates
Price Ceilings on the Sale of New Homes?" (Yes, this is an
exaggeration...I think.)
The Political Reaction
In an interview
with Canadian Press, NDP Leader Tom Mulcair called Flaherty’s actions
"Banana Republic behaviour,” saying the minister has no right to
interfere with a free marketplace (somewhat ironic commentary from the
NDP, but that’s another matter).
"Either we have a market or we don't," Mulcair added. "The banks have
huge profits. The idea that they shouldn't be able to give a break to
consumers is ridiculous and the idea that the Minister of Finance would
basically be trying to create some kind of a cartel among the banks and
the financial institutions as to what they can offer consumers by way of
interest rates is I think completely inappropriate, completely
wrong..."
Liberal interim leader Bob Rae expressed similar sentiments, calling the minister’s actions “ridiculous.”
The DoF is now asking banks to use their rates as tools to regulate
the housing market. That’s not their role. Banks, as private sector
entities, have an obligation to legally maximize profit. It's their job
to set rates as high or as low as may be required to achieve
that goal. Banks have every right to compete as hard for mortgages as
the myriad of other lenders currently advertising 2.89% or less.
One might argue that banks benefit from selling government-backed insured mortgages, and that they should therefore defer to the Finance Minister’s wishes. But all
lenders sell insured mortgages. Why single out just the banks by
compelling them (and only them) to advertise artificially high rates?
Moreover, what if rates continue lower and stay low for years? Or
what if home prices dive after the spring market? In these cases,
governmental rate tampering would prove pointless, with the sole effect
of taking money from borrowers' wallets (through higher interest) and
transferring it to bank coffers.
Prudence Misdefined
Each time banks advertise sub-3% five-year fixed mortgages, Flaherty exhorts that lenders be “prudent.”
But lowering rates (to match one’s competitors and reflect
market-wide improvements in funding costs) is not “imprudent.” Lending
to borrowers who don’t qualify for a mortgage is imprudent. There’s a difference.
Some suggest that when big banks advertise low rates, it fuels excess
home demand. But few people see 3.09% and say “I can’t afford a house”
and then see 2.99% and say “Hey, I can afford a house.”
A one-tenth of a percentage point rate reduction lets someone qualify
for less than a 1% higher purchase price (based on standard debt ratio calculations). That is far from bubble-inducing.
Behind the Hype
When banks advertise rates that are already widely available, they’re
not triggering a “race to the bottom” as the minister suggests. Rates
are driven lower by market forces—which currently include shrinking
mortgage volumes, narrowing spreads
and falling funding costs. Micro-pricing adjustments by individual
banks, however large those banks may be, barely impact market demand—and
only in the short-term.
If anything, it is Flaherty’s own public crusade against rate
promotions that is raising the profile of low rates. It’s sparking more
consumer mortgage interest than any bank advertising could.
Indeed, if it weren’t for all the media attention Flaherty has
caused, sub-3% rates would just blow over. But instead, a small number
of buyers may now actually rush to get a mortgage “before the government
bans 2.89%,” as one of our worried readers expressed today.
Patience…
Mr.
Flaherty doesn't want spiralling home prices to lead to a real estate
collapse. And that’s completely understandable. But a few tenths of a
percent off rates will not trump market fundamentals in determining
where home prices go from here.
At this stage, the real estate market needs time to digest all of the
mortgage restrictions from 2012 and find its own equilibrium. And we’re
already seeing signs of that with inventories building for the last three quarters and sales down sharply.
If the market doesn’t self-correct, the DoF, in its quest to moderate
home prices, has the ability to tighten lending regs further. At least
in that case, market-wide regulation would apply to all mortgage
providers equally, and not just handicap the banks.
As I wrote in the Globe & Mail yesterday (story link),
consumers are the losers here. If a bank customer pays one-tenth of a
percentage point more as a result of Flaherty’s actions, that’s $1,200
more interest over five years on a $250,000 mortgage.
So far, the other bank on Flaherty’s radar, BMO,
hasn’t caved to the pressure and is still advertising a 2.99% five-year
rate. It’s refreshing to know that some bankers are brave enough to
give consumers a fair shake and do what they're paid to do: sell
mortgages.
Rob McLister, CMT |
Categories: McLister
Post a Comment
Oops!
The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.
1 Comment
Loading...

Reply
Gold Physical Tips
5:23 AM on June 26, 2013
Hey There. I discovered your weblog the usage of msn. This is a really well written article. I'll make sure to bookmark it and come back to read extra of your helpful information. Thank you for the post. I'll certainly return.
Categories
/
Oops!
Oops, you forgot something.